A gauze-pad wrapping of the heart can save a patient's life

Abstract We describe one case of iatrogenic rupture of the left ventricle after mitral valve replacement and myectomy of the outflow tract. The cause and site of the rupture could not be identified, neither from the internal nor from the external examination. After unsuccessful use of hemostatic patches in the surface of the ruptured area, wrapping of the ventricles with a surgical gauze pad controlled the hemorrhage, hence saving the patient's life.

A Gauze-Pad Wrapping of the Heart Can Save a Patient's Life.

We describe one case of iatrogenic rupture of the left ventricle after mitral valve replacement and myectomy of the outflow tract. The cause and site of the rupture could not be identified, neither from the internal nor from the external examination. After unsuccessful use of hemostatic patches in the surface of the ruptured area, wrapping of the ventricles with a surgical gauze pad controlled the hemorrhage, hence saving the patient's life.

Diaphragmmatic eventration: long-term follow-up and results of open-chest plicature.

OBJECTIVE: Diaphragmmatic eventration is a relatively uncommon entity with a simple surgical correction technique--plication of the diaphragm. This study aims to assess the clinical and ventilatory impact of this technique. MATERIALS: From April 1988 to February 2007, we operated on 20 patients (12 men) with diaphragmmatic eventration using the postero-lateral approach and correction by radial plication. The mean age of the patients studied was 56.3+/-15.6 years (range: 13-74 years). A traumatic cause was identified in 13 patients; one patient had a congenital cause and the remainder were of idiopathic origin. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and arterial hypertension were present in one-half of the study group, while diabetes mellitus was present in three patients. Dyspnoea was the most common complaint in 75% of the patients, and thoracic pain was present in 25%. The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and vital capacity (VC) were 66.2+/-15.3% and 70.4+/-16% of the predicted values, respectively. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Apart from a patient with moderate/severe pain and another who had pneumonia, there were no other important perioperative complications. Average drainage time was 3.3+/-1.6 days (range: 2-7 days). Hospitalisation time was 6.2+/-1.6 days (5-10 days). Follow-up was complete, for a mean of 59.6+/-55.1 months (4-206 months). There were three late deaths (one sudden, one stroke and one trauma). Eight of the 17 survivors (47%) are asymptomatic. According to the MRC/ATS grading system, the dyspnoea score was 2.06+/-0.97 preoperatively and 1.06+/-1.14 postoperatively (p=0.007). At follow-up, the FEV(1) was 76.1+/-20.1% and the VC was 78.4+/-17.3% (p>0.1). Two patients had chronic pain. CONCLUSION: Plication of the diaphragm is a safe and efficient procedure. Most patients experienced significant clinical improvement with enhancement of the FEV(1) and VC. Chronic surgical pain still remains a potential problem with the classical approach.

Lung metastases from colorectal cancer: surgical resection and prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse our experience with excision of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and to evaluate clinically relevant prognostic factors, identifying the cluster of patients who would benefit from this procedure. METHODS: Sixty-one patients, 42 men (69%), with primary CRC who underwent 94 curative resections of pulmonary metastases were retrospectively reviewed. Age was 30-80 years (mean 61.2+/-15). Population was analysed for age, sex, disease-free interval (DFI), prethoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, location and histology of primary tumour, number of lung lesions (and size of largest resected metastasis), type of lung resection, nodal involvement (hilar/mediastinal), use of adjuvant treatment, morbid-mortality and immediate and follow-up survival. RESULTS: Mean DFI was 29+/-22 months (range 5-132 months). There was no hospital mortality and significant morbidity occurred in five patients (8.2%). Mean follow-up was 39+/-4 months (range 4-173 months). Mean overall survival and disease-free survival were 67+/-16 months and 52+/-6 months, respectively. Three-, 5- and 10-year survival rates from date of primary colorectal resection were 83%, 71% and 43%, respectively. Three-, 5- and 10-year survival rates from date of lung resection were 61%, 48% and 11%, respectively. Five-year survival was 57% in patients with normal prethoracotomy CEA levels and 18% for those with high levels (>5 ng/ml) (p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary metastasectomy has potential survival benefit for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Low morbidity and mortality rates, contrasting with lack of any other effective therapy, justify aggressive surgical management. Single deposits, DFI >36 months and normal prethoracotomy serum CEA were significant independent prognostic factors.

Diagnostic value of surgical lung biopsy: comparison with clinical and radiological diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine overall and disease-related accuracy of the clinical/imagiological evaluation for pulmonary infiltrates of unknown aetiology, compared with the pathological result of the surgical lung biopsy (SLB) and to evaluate the need for the latter in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the experiences of SLB in 366 consecutive patients during the past 5 years. The presumptive diagnosis was based on clinical, imagiological and non-invasive or minimally invasive diagnostic procedures and compared with the gold standard of histological diagnosis by SLB. We considered five major pathological groups: diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD), primitive neoplasms, metastases, infectious disease and other lesions. Patients with previous histological diagnosis were excluded. RESULTS: In 56.0% of patients (n=205) clinical evaluation reached a correct diagnosis, in 42.6% a new diagnosis was established (n=156) by the SLB, which was inconclusive in 1.4% (n=5). The pre-test probability for each disease was 85% for DPLD, 75% for infectious disease, 64% for primitive neoplasms and 60% for metastases. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the clinical/radiological diagnosis were 70%, 90%, 62% and 92%, respectively. For DPLD: 67%, 90%, 76% and 85%; primitive neoplasms: 47%, 90%, 46% and 90%; metastases: 99%, 79%, 60% and 99%; infectious disease 38%, 98%, 53% and 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high sensitivity and specificity of the clinical and imagiological diagnosis, the positive predictive value was low, particularly in the malignancy group. SLB should be performed in pulmonary infiltrates of unknown aetiology because the clinical/imagiological assessment missed and/or misdiagnosed an important number of patients.